Business and Economic Horizons

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 1
Issue 1
Online publication date 2010-04-01
Title An empirical comparison of different risk measures in portfolio optimization
Author Lam Weng Hoe, Jaaman Saiful Hafizah, Isa Zaidi
Abstract Risk is one of the important parameters in portfolio optimization problem. Since the introduction of the mean-variance model, variance has become the most common risk measure used by practitioners and researchers in portfolio optimization. However, the mean-variance model relies strictly on the assumptions that assets returns are multivariate normally distributed or investors have a quadratic utility function. Many studies have proposed different risk measures to overcome the drawbacks of variance.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare the portfolio compositions and performances of four different portfolio optimization models employing different risk measures, specifically the variance, absolute deviation, minimax and semi-variance. Results of this study show that the minimax model outperforms the other models. The minimax model is appropriate for investors who have a strong downside risk aversion.
Citation
References
Bawa, V., 1975. “Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects”, Journal of Financial Economics, 2, pp. 95-121

Biglova, A., Ortobelli, S., Rachev, S. and Stoyanov, S., 2004. “Different approaches to risk estimation in portfolio theory”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 103-112

Brooks, C. and Kat, H., 2002. “The statistical properties of hedge fund index returns and their implications for investors”, Journal of Alternative Investments, 5, pp. 26-44

Byrne, P and Lee, S., 2004. “Different risk measures: Different portfolio compositions?”, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 22, Issue 6, pp. 501-511

Fishburn, P.,  1977. “Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns”, The American Economic Review, 67, pp. 116-126

Grootveld, H. and Hallerbach, W., 1999. “Variance vs Downside risk: Is there really that much difference?”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 114, Issue 2, pp. 304-319

Konno, H. and Yamazaki, H., 1991. “Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and ITS applications to Tokyo stock market”, Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 519-531

Konno, H., Waki, H. and Yuuki, A., 2002. “Portfolio optimization under lower partial risk measures”, Asian-Pasific Financial Markets 9 (2002), pp. 127-140

Markowitz, H., 1952. “Portfolio selection”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.77-91

Markowitz, H., 1959. Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments, John Wiley & Sons, New York

Pratt, J., 1964. “Risk aversion in the small and in the large”, Econometrica, Vol. 32, No. 1/2, pp. 122-136

Simaan, Y., 1997. “Estimation risk in portfolio selection: The mean variance model versus the mean absolute deviation model”, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1437-1446

Young, M., 1998. “A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution”, Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 673-683

Keywords Portfolio, optimization, risk measures, variance.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/beh.2010.06
Pages 39-45
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Share
Search in articles
Statistics
Journal Published articles
BEH 558
Journal Hits
BEH 1135085
Journal Downloads
BEH 41305
Total users online -