Business and Economic Horizons

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 1
Issue 1
Online publication date 2010-04-01
Title A small nation’s comparative advantage: The case of Latvia
Author Aleksandrs Fedotovs
Abstract Problem of comparative advantage in international trade is important in theoretical and practical aspect. Theoretical models in this area are periodically re-examined in search for empirical evidence. The aim of the paper is to verify the two fundamental theories in the case of a small European country - Latvia - and disclose problems in the country’s trade specialization. In Latvia’s trade with “old” EU countries, the Ricardian model and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem can be corroborated. After 2000, however, share of EU-15 countries in Latvia’s exports steadily declines. Instead, share of regional (Baltic) market increases, while the potential of CIS markets remains underexploited. Problem of identifying new areas of comparative advantage has become especially acute for Latvia. Latvia still can be considered a country with educated and easily teachable labour. Threat to this advantage is caused now by labour emigration and by situation in the country’s science and educational system. Research is based upon application of traditional theory, analysis of official editions, comparison of statistical data, and author’s own calculations.
Bowen, H., Leamer, E., Sveikauskas, L., 1987. “Multicountry, multifactor tests of the factor   abundance theory”, American Economic Review, 77, December, pp. 791-809

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, Statistical Yearbook of Latvia 19951995, 1997, 1999, 2007, Riga

Centrālā statistikas pārvalde (Statistical Yearbook of Latvia), 1929, 1934, 1939. Latvijas statistikas gada grāmata, Rīga

Daniels, J., Radebaugh, L., Sullivan, D., 2004. International business: Environments and operations, 10th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall

Hill, Ch., 2003. International business: Competing in the global marketplace, 4th ediion, McGraw-Hill, Irwin

Krugman P., Obstfeld M., 2003. International economics, 6th edition, Addison -Wesley

Lībermanis, G. 1997. Starptautiskie ekonomiskie sakari un Latvija (International Economic Relations and Latvia, in Latvian), Kamene, Rīga, p.141

LR Ekonomikas Ministrija; LR Centrālā Statistikas pārvalde, 2009. Latvijas tautsaimniecība: Makroekonomiskais apskats (National Economy of Latvia: Macroeconomic Survey, in Latvian), Nr.3 (40), Rīga 

Medvedev, A., 2002. Меzhdunarodnij menedzhment (International management, in Russian), IMISP, St. Petersbourg

Ministry of Economics, Republic of Latvia, 2001-2007 Semi-Annual Reports. “Economic Development of Latvia: Report”, June and December, Riga

Ministry of Economics, Republic of Latvia, 2010.

Porter, M., 1998. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, The Free Press, New York

Porter, M., 1998. The competitive advantage of nations, The Free Press, New York

Wood, A., 1994. “Give Heckscher and Ohlin a chance!”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, January, pp.20-49

Keywords Сomparative advantage, competitive advantage, wood exports, EU, economy of Latvia.
Pages 51-57
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Search in articles
Journal Published articles
BEH 607
Journal Hits
BEH 1382787
Journal Downloads
BEH 46078
Total users online -