Business and Economic Horizons

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 13
Issue 2
Online publication date 2017-06-04
Title Formation of production networks in ASEAN: Measuring the real value-added and identifying the role of ASEAN countries in the world supply chains
Author Miguel Angel Esquivias Padilla, Dyah Wulan Sari, Rossanto Dwi Handoyo
This study addresses the two-fold question of whether the integration-liberalization process of ASEAN is headed towards the creation of a single production base region, and how ASEAN links with other trade blocks. It looks into the degree of intra-ASEAN and extra-ASEAN vertical integration vis-à-vis North America, East Asia, and the European Union through the measurement of value-added creation-absorption in global value chains (GVC) and by locating ASEAN within vertical structures. The study employs an international input-output database and breaks up gross exports into different components of value-added using data from 1997, 2004, and 2012. ASEAN has made significant gains in integrating with East Asia. However, ASEAN as a single production region has gained little, and even lost share in value-added trade with NAFTA and Europe. The truth is that ASEAN has a stronger role across the GVC as a supplier of intermediate goods (33%) than as a supplier of final goods (30%). Vertical structures represent more than 43% of ASEAN gross exports, but it still depends on foreign parts and components (35%) to produce its exports. It may be argued that ASEAN 6, which entails a wider scope of integration, might offer larger benefits to the ASEAN project. 

Ando, M. (2006). Fragmentation and vertical intra-industry trade in East Asia. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 257-281.
Ando, M. (2008). Economic effects of an ASEAN 6 Free Trade Agreement : A CGE model simulation analysis. Asia Research Report 2007.
Ando, M., & Kimura, F. (2003). The formation of international production and distribution networks in East Asia. Working Paper 10167.
Athukorala, P.-C. (2012). Asian trade flows: Trends, patterns and prospects. Japan and the World Economy, 24(2), 150-162.
Athukorala, P.-C., & Menon, J. (2010). Global production sharing, trade patterns, and determinants of trade flows in East Asia. Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 41, Asian Development Bank.
Athukorala, P.-C., & Yamashita, N. (2006). Production fragmentation and trade integration: East Asia in a global context. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 233-256.
Daudin, G., Schweisguth, D., & Rifflart, C. (2011). Who produces for whom in the world economy? The Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1403-1437.
Dean, J., Fung, K. C., & Wang, Z. (2008). Measuring the vertical specialization in Chinese trade. Working Papers, Santa Cruz Center for International Economics. Retrrom
Fukao, K., Ishido, H., & Ito, K. (2003). Vertical intra-industry trade and foreign direct investment in East Asia. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17(4), 468-506.
Haddad, M. (2007). Trade integration in East Asia: The role of China and production networks (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 969237). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from
Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K.-M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(1), 75-96.
Hummels, D., Rapoport, D., & Yi, K.-M. (1998). Vertical specialization and the changing nature of world trade. Economic Policy Review, 4(2).
Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012a). Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added. Journal of International Economics, 86(2), 224-236.
Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012b). Fragmentation and trade in value added over four decades. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jones, R. W., & Kierzkowski, H. (1990). The role of services in production and international trade: A theoretical framework. R. Jones, A. Krueger (Eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Kimura, F. (2006). International production and distribution networks in East Asia: Eighteen facts, mechanics, and policy implications. Asian Economic Policy Review, 1(2), 326-344.
Koopman, R., Powers, W., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2010). Give credit where credit is due: Tracing value added in global production chains. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2012). Tracing Value-added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459-94.
Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2014). Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. The American Economic Review, 104(2), 459-494.
Obashi, A. (2010). Stability of production networks in East Asia: Duration and survival of trade. Japan and the World Economy, 22(1), 21-30.
Sato, K., & Shrestha, N. (2014). Global and regional shock transmission -An Asian perspective-. Center for Economic and Social Studies in Asia (CESSA) Working Paper, 4. Retrieved from WP 2014-04.pdf
Shrestha, N. (2015). Global chains for value added and intermediate goods in Asia. CESAA Working Paper 2015-07. Retrieved from WP 2015-07.pdf
Urata, S. (2008). An ASEAN 6 economic partnership: Significance and tasks. Asia Research Report 2007. Tokyo: Japan Center for Economic Research. Retrieved from
Wang, Z., Wei, S.-J., & Zhu, K. (2013). Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 19677.
Yi, K.-M. (2003). Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? Journal of Political Economy, 111(1), 52-102.
Keywords Key words: Vertical specialization, AFTA, production networks, value-added trade, global input-output
Pages 237-255
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Search in articles
Journal Published articles
BEH 608
Journal Hits
BEH 1414059
Journal Downloads
BEH 46643
Total users online -