Business and Economic Horizons

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 14
Issue 3
Online publication date 2018-06-14
Title Outsider vs insider: Does firm governance matter?
Author Yahya Uthman Abdullahi, Rokiah Ishak, Norfaiezah Sawandi
Abstract
As CEO turnover occurs, the company may select an insider or outsider as a successor. This study attempts to ascertain whether firm performance, female directors, board religiosity and blockholder ownership influence the decision to appoint an internal or external candidate. Results from logistic regression analysis on 72 succession events over a five-year period (2011 to 2015) reveal that firms which are controlled by blockholders and those with females on their boards tend to select an outsider as the successor. Meanwhile, firms that have Muslims on their boards are more likely to select insiders as successors. This study implies that poor firm performance does not necessarily lead to outside CEO selection choice. On the overall, the findings indicate that blockholder ownership and gender diversity in the boardroom matter in the Nigerian corporate landscape.
Citation
References
Abdullah, S. N. (2014). The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(4), 1137-1159. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9279-0

Acero, I., & Alcalde, N. (2014). Ownership structure and board composition in a high ownership concentration context. European Management Journal, 32(4), 646-657. 

Alves, P., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2015). Board of directors’ composition and capital structure. Research in International Business and Finance, 35, 1-32. 

Ansari, F. I., Goergen, M., & Mira, S. (2014). The determinants of the CEO successor choice in family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 6-25. 

Bekiris, V. F. (2013). Ownership structure and board structure : are corporate governance mechanisms interrelated ? The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(4), 352-364. http://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2011-0013

Bereskin, F. L., & Hsu, P. (2011). New Dogs New Tricks : CEO Turnover , CEO-related Factors , and Innovation Performance (Working paper), University of Delaware and University of Hong Kong. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org

Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V, & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are boards designed to fail ? The Implausibility of Effective Board Monitoring. The Academy of Management Annals, (February), 1-90. http://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120957

Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2012). CEO turnover in China: the role of market- based and accounting performance measures. The European Journal of Finance, (December 2012), 37-41. http://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2012.676559

Custódio, C., Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2011). Generalists versus specialists: managerial skills and CEO Pay. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1670243

Erah, D. O, Samuel, E and Izedonmi, F. (2012). Chief Executive Officer duality and financial performance of firms in Nigeria, 2(6), 125-134.

Fisman, R. J., Khurana, R., Rhodes-Kropf, M., & Yim, S. (2014). Governance and CEO turnover: do something or do the right thing ?, 60 (June), 319-337.

Goyal, V. K., & Park, C. W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 49-66.

Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., & Weston, J. (2009). Religion and corporate (Mis) behavior. Available at SSRN 1472118, (713). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1472118

Ishak, R. (2010). Determinants and consequences of CEO succession in Malaysian public listed companies. Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Ishak, R., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Abdullah, S. N. (2013). CEO succession and firm performance: evidence from publicly listed Malaysian firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(2), 29-48.

Ishak, R., Ku Ismail, K. N., & Abdullah, S. N. (2012). Determinants of internal vs external CEO Successions in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 79-96.

Ishak, R., & Latif, R. A. (2013). CEO succession: is it good or bad news? In Proceedings of 7th Global Business and Social Science Research Conference (pp. 13-14).

Jenter, D., & Lewellen, K. (2010). Performance-induced CEO turnover. Work. Pap., Stanford Univ.

Kim, J., & Daniel, S. J. (2016). Religion and corporate governance: evidence from 32 countries,  Asia-Paicfic Financial Studies, 45(2), 281-308. http://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12130

Ku Ismail, K. N., & Abdul-Manaf, K. B. (2016). Market reactions towards the appointment of women to the boards of Malaysian firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 36, 75-78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2016.04.004

Larcker, B. D. F., Miles, S. a, & Tayan, B. (2014). Seven myths of CEO succession. Stanford Closer Look Series.

Lindrianasari, & Hartono, J. (2012). Antecedent and consequence factors of CEO turnover in Indonesia. Management Research Review, 35(3/4), 206-224. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/09564230910978511

Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169-184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016

Maharjan, J. (2015). Essays on Executive Turnover. Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 419. Retrieved July 5, 2018, from https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/ art_sci_etds/419

Mallin, C., Melis, A., & Gaia, S. (2014). The remuneration of independent directors in the UK and Italy: An empirical analysis based on agency theory. International Business Review, 24(2), 175-186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.006

Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom - The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527-554. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.003

McGuire, S. T., Newton, N. J., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2012). Does Local Religiosity Impact Corporate Social Responsibility? SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.1926387

Nafukho, F. M., Hairston, N., & Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: implications for human resource development development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545-551. http://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000299843

Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2014). Does boardroom gender diversity matter ? Evidence from a transitional economy. International Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 184-202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.022

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 15. Nova Iorque: McGraw Hill.

Rachpradit, P., Tang, J. C. S., & Ba Khang, D. (2012). CEO turnover and firm performance, evidence from Thailand. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 164-178.

Thanh, T. T., & Heaney, R. (2013). The determinants of equity agency conflicts between managers and shareholders : Evidence from Australia. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 23(4), 314-326. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2013.05.001

Vafeas, N., & Vlittis, A. (2014). Board influence on the selection of external accounting executives. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 46-65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.08.005

Volonte, C. (2015). Culture and corporate governance: the influence of language and religion in Switzerland, Manag Int Rev, 55(1), 77-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0216-5
Keywords Blockholder, CEO selection, performance, gender diversity, religiosity
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.48
Pages 689-699
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Share
Search in articles
Statistics
Journal Published articles
BEH 558
Journal Hits
BEH 1135116
Journal Downloads
BEH 41305
Total users online -