Business and Economic Horizons

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 14
Issue 4
Online publication date 2018-08-25
Title Is there any causality between Islamic banks’ return on depositors and conventional banks’ deposit interest: Evidence of causality from Bahrain’s financial market
Author Abdus Samad
Abstract
Unlike conventional banks' interest payment on deposits, Islamic banks do not pay interest to depositors. What they pay to depositors is called the rate of return to depositors. Does the rate of return of Islamic banks on deposits follow conventional banks' interest rates? This paper empirically investigates the relationship of causality and the causal direction between conventional banks' interest rate and Islamic banks' return applying VEC model. The results of the VAR Granger Causality/Block Exogeneity Wald Tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of bidirectional causality between Islamic banks' rate of return and conventional banks' interest. The pairwise Granger causality also confirms the same results. This suggests that Islamic banks' rate of return and the conventional banks' interest rate are not independent of each other rather they follow each other in the Bahrain financial market.
Citation
References
Ahmad, Z. (1984). Concept and models of Islamic banking: An assessment. Islamabad: International Institute of Islamic Economics.

Cevik, S., & Charap, J. (2011). The behavior of conventional and Islamic bank deposit returns in Malaysia and Turkey (IMF Working paper,11/156). IMF.

Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and economic challenge. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.

Chong, B. S., & Liu, M. H. (2009). Islamic banking: Interest free or interest based?. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17, 125-144.

Fayed, M. E. (2013). Comparative performance study of conventional and Islamic banking in Egypt. Journal of Applied Banking and Finance, 3 (2), 1-14.

Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199-211.

Hamwi, B., & Aylward, A. (1999). Islamic finance: A growing international market. Thunderbird International Business Review, 41, 407-420. 

Henry, J., & Weidmann, J. (1995). Asymmetry in the EMS revisited: evidence from the causality analysis of daily Eurorates. Annales D'Économie Et De Statistique, 40, 125-160. 

Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (1999). Progress and challenges of Islamic banking. Thunderbird International Business Review, 41, 381-405.

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimating hypothesis and testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551-80.

Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegration vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kazarian, E. G. 1993. Islamic versus traditional banking: Financial Innovation in Egypt. Boulder: West View Press.

Khan, M. S. (1986). Islamic interest free banking (IMF Staff paper, 33). IMF.

MacKinnon, J. G., Haug, A. A., & Michelis, L. (1999). Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. J. Appl. Econ., 14, 563-577.

Mannan, M. A. (1968). Islam and trend in modern banking: Theory and practice of interest-free banking. Islamic Review and Arab Affairs, (December 1968), 73-95.

Miller, S., & Russek, F. (1990). Cointegration and error correction models: The temporal causality between government taxes and spending. Southern Economic Journal, 57(1), 221-229.

Nelson, C., & Plosser, C. (1982). Trend and random walk in macroeconomics time-series: Some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 139-162

Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1631-1401.

Samad, A., Hassan, M., & Ghani,  A. (2005). Financial performance of commercial banks: A study of Bahrain banking. Middle East Business and Economic Review, 17(1), 20-28.

Samad, A., Gardner, N., & Cook, B. J. (2005). Islamic banking and finance in theory and practice: The Malaysian and Bahrain experience. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences,  22(2), 71-86.

Samad, A. (2004). Performance of interest-free Islamic banks vis-à-vis interest based conventional banks of Bahrain. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2), 115-129.

Samad, A. (2013). Impact of global financial crisis: Evidences from the cross-country Islamic banks. British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 7(2), 4-63.

Samad, A., & Chawdhury, A. (2017). Islamic banks' return on depositors and conventional banks' deposit interest: is there causality? Evidence of causality from Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 1-8.

Siddiqi, M. N. (1983). Issues in Islamic banking, Leicester: Islamic Foundation

Zawya (2015). Malaysia Islamic finance country report 2015: mainstreaming Islamic finance within global financial systems. Malaysia Islamic Finance Report 2015.  http:// www.zaway.com

Zivot, E., & Andrews, W. K. D. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251-270.
Keywords Bahrain, conventional bank, interest rate, Islamic bank, rate of return, Granger causality
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.61
Pages 894-912
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Share
Search in articles
Statistics
Journal Published articles
BEH 558
Journal Hits
BEH 1131686
Journal Downloads
BEH 41242
Total users online -