Business and Economic Horizons

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 15
Issue 2
Online publication date 2019-04-25
Title Initial and long-term performance of IPOs. Does growth opportunity of issuing firm matter?
Author Norliza Che-Yahya, Siti Suhaila Abdul Rahman
The performance of initial public offerings (IPOs) can be viewed at least into two different periods; initial aftermarket and long-term aftermarket. This study is initiated to examine the influence of growth opportunities of firms on initial aftermarket and long-term aftermarket performance. It is crucial to study on the influence of growth opportunities of firms in both periods as the investors, regardless of investment horizons, are looking for capital appreciation so that they can continuously secure good returns in the aftermarket. The growth opportunities are defined as the potential of issuing firms to positively survive in periods after their listing in stock market. The growth opportunities are measured by the allocation of proceeds received during the issuance of newly issued shares to activities which are expected to increase growth of a firm; e.g., spending on capital expenditure and asset acquisition. The information of “growth opportunities” of firms can be gathered from firm prospectus, particularly in the “use of proceeds” section. The growth opportunities of firms are proposed to serve as a signaling tool that transmits information on growth potential of firms to potential investors. This study proposes that higher amount of IPO proceeds allocated to growth and investment activities will attract higher numbers of potential investors to subscribe for the firms’ shares. A higher demand and subscription from investors will boost up price of the shares, thus lead to higher aftermarket returns. Employing 403 IPOs listed in Bursa Malaysia from January 2000 to December 2014, this study documents a positive significant relationship between growth opportunities and performance of IPOs in both periods: initial aftermarket and long-term aftermarket.
Abdul-Rahim, R., Che-Yahya, N., & Mohd-Rashid, R. (2015). A two-dimensional approach in examining IPO behaviour in the immediate aftermarket: Malaysian Evidence (August 19, 2015). Available at SSRN:

Abdul-Rahim, R., & Yong, O. (2010). Initial returns of Malaysian IPOs and Shari'a‐compliant status. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1(1), 60-74. 

Abdul-Rahim, R., & Che-Embi, N. A. (2013). Initial returns of Shariah versus Non-Shariah IPOs: Are there any differences? Jurnal Pengurusan, 39, 37-50. 

Abraham, R., Harris, J., & Auerbach, J. (2016). IPO performance at announcement and in the aftermarket, Journal of Economic Studies, 43(4), 574-586.

Aggarwal, R., Leal, R., & Hernandez, L. (1993). The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Latin America. Financial management, 2(1). 42-53. 

Amor, S. B., & Kooli, M. (2017). Intended use of proceeds and post-IPO performance. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 65, 168-181. 

Anderloni, L., & Tanda, A. (2017). Green energy companies: Stock performance and IPO returns. Research in International Business and Finance, 39(Part A), 546-552. 

Andriansyah, A., & Messinis, G. (2016). Intended use of IPO proceeds and firm performance: A quantile regression approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 36, 14-30. 

Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. G. (2015). Applied Econometrics: Palgrave Macmillan.

Autore, D. M., Bray, D. E., & Peterson, D. R. (2009). Intended use of proceeds and the long-run performance of seasoned equity issuers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(3), 358-367. 

Banerjee, S., Dai, L., & Shrestha, K. (2011). Cross-country IPOs: What explains differences in underpricing? Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1289-1305. 

Che-Yahya, N., & Abdul-Rahim, R. (2014). IPO voluntary lockups and flipping activity of Malaysian IPOs. Journal of Finance and Financial Services, 1, 133-147. 

Che-Yahya, N., Abdul-Rahim, R., & Mohd Rashid, R. (2018). The influence of" offer for sale" by existing shareholders on investors’ reaction in the IPO immediate aftermarket. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(4), 818-828. 

Che-Yahya, N., Abdul-Rahim, R., & Yong, O. (2013). Influence of lockup provision on flipping activity of Malaysian IPOs. Economics and Finance Review, 3(4), 11-24. 

Che-Yahya, N., Mohd Rashid, A. H., A. Rahman, I., & Mohd Rashid, S. N. (2017). The impact of "offer for sale" by existing shareholders in an IPO on initial aftermarket performance. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(2), 254-269. 

Chong, F., & Puah, C.-H. (2009). The Malaysian IPO market: Volume, initial returns and economic conditions. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(5), 182-192. 

Chou, D.-W., Gombola, M., & Liu, F.-Y. (2009). Long-run underperformance following private equity placements: The role of growth opportunities. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 1113-1128. 

Chung, K. H., Li, M., & Yu, L. (2005). Assets in place, growth opportunities, and IPO returns. Financial Management (Wiley-Blackwell), 34(3), 65-88. 

Corhay, A., Teo, S., & Tourani Rad, A. (2002). The long run performance of Malaysian initial public offerings (IPO): Value and growth effects. Managerial Finance, 28(2), 52-65.

Dawson, S. M. (1987). Secondary stock market performance of initial public offers, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia: 1978-1984. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 14(1), 65-76. 

Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2012). IPO survival in a reputational market. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 39(3-4), 427-463. 

Goergen, M., Khurshed, A., & Mudambi, R. (2007). The long‐run performance of UK IPOs: can it be predicted? Managerial Finance, 33(6), 401-419.

Gross, J., & Groß, J. (2003). Linear regression: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Jeanneret, P. (2005). Use of the proceeds and long-term performance of French SEO firms. European Financial Management, 11(1), 99-122. 

Leone, A. J., Rock, S., & Vasvari, F. P. (2007). Disclosure of intended use of proceeds and underpricing in initial public offerings. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(1), 111-153
Leong, K., Vos, E., & Tourani-Rad, A. (1999). Malaysia IPOs performance pre-and post Asian Crisis. Paper presented at the AMB AMRO International Conference on Initial Public Offerings, Amsterdam, 2-4 July.

Levis, M. (1993). The long-run performance of initial public offerings - The UK experience 1980-1988. Financial management, 22(1), 28-41. 

Mohamad, S., Nassir, A. M., & Ariff, M. (1994). Analysis of underpricing in the Malaysian new issues market during 1975-1990: Are new issues excessively underpriced. Capital Markets Review, 2(2), 17-27. 

Mohd Rashid, R., Abdul-Rahim, R., & Yong, O. (2014). The influence of lock-up provisions on IPO initial returns: Evidence from an emerging market. Economic Systems, 38(4), 487-501.

Mousa, F.-T. (2009). When do slack resources impact new venture success? (3382116 Ph.D.), Washington State University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved April 12, 2019, from   

Rath, S. (2008). The survival of initial public offerings in Australia. Paper presented at the Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program, UK.

Reuer, J. J., & Tong, T. W. (2010). Discovering valuable growth opportunities: An analysis of equity alliances with IPO firms. Organization Science, 21(1), 202-215. 

Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long‐run performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3-27. 

Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23-40. 

Sheela, S., Sanjay, G., & Fairuz Ahmad, Z. (2017). Impact of investors’ protection, transparency level and legal origin on initial public offering (IPO) initial returns. Managerial Finance, 43(7), 738-760. 

Song, S., Tan, J., & Yi, Y. (2014). IPO initial returns in China: Underpricing or overvaluation? China Journal of Accounting Research, 7(1), 31-49. 

Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (1999). The going‐public decision and the development of financial markets. The Journal of Finance, 54(3), 1045-1082. 

Tajuddin, A. H., Abdullah, N. A. H., & Taufil-Mohd, K. N. (2016). Does growth opportunity matter in explaining the oversubscription phenomena of Malaysian IPO? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219(Supplement C), 748-754. 

Walker, M. D., & Yost, K. (2008). Seasoned equity offerings: What firms say, do, and how the market reacts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 376-386. 

Wan Hussin, W. N. (2005). The effects of owners' participation and lockup on IPO underpricing in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 1(10), 19-36. 

Yong, O. (2016). Cheap IPO: Does it matter? The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(5), 453-460. 

Yong, O., Yatim, P., & Sapian, R. Z. Z. (2011). Initial and long-run performance of new issues on the Malaysian stock market. Corporate Finance Review, 5(6), 28-41. 

Zarafat, H., & Vejzagic, M. (2014). The long-term performance of initial public offerings: Evidence from Bursa Malaysia. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 4(1), 43-51

Keywords Growth opportunities, initial public offerings, initial aftermarket return, long-term aftermarket return
Pages 276-292
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Search in articles
Journal Published articles
BEH 626
Journal Hits
BEH 1503570
Journal Downloads
BEH 47811
Total users online -