Indian Journal of Science and Technology

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Sample volume 1
Title Developing a Fuzzy model for assessment and selection of the best idea of new product development
Author Ali Badizadeh, Sohrab Khanmohammadi
Abstract
This paper introduces a model for evaluating and prioritizing new products development ideas. As the environment of decision making includes full of ambiguities and uncertainties, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model is applied to evaluate and prioritize the ideas based on the criteria. To validate the proposed mode, the results of the proposed model are compared with the results of applying the traditional AHP model in a manufacturer of Automobile parts. The comparison indicates that applying the proposed model would lead to more reliable and compatible results than the uncertain environment of decision making process. 

Citation
References
1. Akova B, Ulusoy G, Payzın E and Kayla AR (2003) 
An integrated new product development model for the 
Turkish electronics industry. Working Paper, Bogazici 
University, Istanbul, 2003.  
2. Azadeh A, Nazari-Shirkouhi S, Hatami-Shirkouhi L 
and Ansarinejad A (2011) A unique fuzzy multicriteria decision 
making: computer simulation approach for productive operators’ 
assignment in cellular manufacturing systems with uncertainty 
and vagueness. Intl. J. Adv. Manufacturing Technol. 6(1-4), 329-343.
3. Azadeh A, Shirkouhi SN and Rezaie K (2010) A 
robust decision-making methodology for evaluation 
and selection of simulation software package. Intl. J. 
Adv.Manufacturing Technol. 47(1), 381–393. 
4. Bstieler L and Gross CW (2003) Measuring the effect 
of environmental uncertainty on process activities, 
project  team characteristics, and new product 
success.  J.  Business & Industrial Marketing.  
18(2), 146–161. 
5. Chang P and Chen K (2004) The influence of input 
factors on new leading product development projects 
in Taiwan.  Intl. J. Project Management.  22(5), 415-423.
6. Chen J, Reilly RR and Lynn GS (2005) Uncertainty: Is 
it a threat or opportunity for new product development 
teams? Wesley J. Howe School of Technology 
Management Stevens Institute of Technology. 
Institute for the Study of Business Markets The 
Pennsylvania State University.  
7. Cooper RG and Kleinschmidt EJ (2007) Winning 
businesses in product development: The critical 
success factors. Res. Technol. Mgt. 50(3), 52–66. 
8. De Brentani U, Kleinschmidt EJ and Salomo S (2010) 
Success in global new product development: Impact 
of strategy and the behavioral environment of the 
firm. J. Product Innovation Mgt. 27(2), 143-160. 
9. Ebrahim NA, Ahmed S and Taha Z (2010) Critical 
factors for new product developments in SMEs virtual 
team. Afri. J. Business Mgt. 4(11), 2247–2257. 
10. Feyzoğlu O and Büyüközkan G (2008) An integrated 
group decision-making approach for new product 
development.  Intl. J. Computer Integrated Manufact. 
21(4), 366. 
11. Frambach RT, Prabhu J and Verhallen TM (2003) 
The influence of business strategy on new  product 
activity: The role of market orientation.  Intl. J. Res. 
Marketing. 20(4), 377–397. 
12. Gehin A, Zwolinski P and Brissaud D (2008) A tool to 
implement sustainable end-of-life strategies in the 
product development phase.  J. Cleaner Production. 
16(5), 566-576.
13. Ho Y and Tsai C (2011) Comparing ANFIS and SEM 
in linear and nonlinear forecasting of new product 
development performance. Expert Sys.  Applications. 
38(6), 6498-6507. 
14. Huang X, Soutar GN and Brown A (2002) New 
product development processes in small and 
medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian 
evidence. J. Small Business Mgt. 40(1), 27–42. 
15. Iranmanesh H, Shirkouhi SN and Skandari MR 
(2008) Risk evaluation of information technology 
projects based on fuzzy analytic hierarchal process. 
Intl. J. Computer & Information Sci. & Engg. 2(1), 38-44.
16. Iwu CG (2010) Impact of product development and 
innovation on market share.  Afri. J. Business Mgt. 
4(13), 2659–2667. 
17. Kan Mohammadi S, Hassanzadeh I, Mathur RM and 
Patil KV (2000) A new fuzzy decision-making 
procedure applied to emergency electric power 
distribution scheduling.  Engg. Applicat. Artificial 
Intelligence. 13(6), 731-740. 
18. Kuen CW, Zailani S and Fernando Y (2009) Critical 
factors influencing the project success amongst 
manufacturing companies in Malaysia.  Afri. J. 
Business Mgt. 3(1), 016–027. 
19. Lee LY, Fu CS, Li SM and Chen SM (2011) The 
effects of a project’s social capital, leadership style, 
modularity, and diversification on new product 
development performance. Afr. J. Business Mgt. 5(1), 
142-155.
20. Lin M, Wang C, Chen M and Chang CA (2008) Using 
AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven 
product design process.  Computers in Industry. 
59(1), 17-31. 
21. Lu LY and Yang C (2004) The R&D and marketing 
cooperation across new product development stages: 
An empirical study of Taiwan's IT industry.  Industl. 
Marketing Mgt. 33(7), 593–605. 
22. Lynn GS, Abel KD, Valentine WS and Wright RC 
(1999) Key factors in increasing speed to market and 
improving new product success rates.  Industl. 
Marketing Mgt. 28(4), 319–326.
23. March-Chordā I, Gunasekaran A and LloriaAramburo B (2002) 
Product development process in 
Spanish SMEs: an empirical research. Technovation. 
22(5), 301–312. 
24. Naghadehi MZ, Mikaeil R and Ataei M (2009) The 
application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
(FAHP) approach to selection of optimum 
underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, 
Iran. Expert Sys. Applications. 36(4), 8218–8226.
25. Nair B and Radhadevi S (2006)  Competitive and 
collaborative supply chains: The strategic role of 
product innovation, secondary markets and channel 
structure. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at 
Austin. 
26. Noke H and Hughes M (2010) Climbing the value 
chain: Strategies to create a new product 
development capability in mature SMEs.  Intl. J. 
Operations & Product. Mgt. 30(2), 132-154. 
27. Ozer M (2005) Factors which influence decision 
making in new product evaluation.  European J. 
Operational Res. 163(3), 784–801. 
28. Petrick IJ and Echols AE (2004) Technology 
roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable 
new product development decisions.  Technological 
Forecasting & Social Change. 71(1-2), 81–100. 
29. Pun KF, Yiu MY and Chin KS (2010) Developing a 
self-assessment model for measuring new product 
development performance: an AHP approach. Intl. J. 
Adv. Operations Mgt. 2(1), 57–79. 
30. Rezaie K, Byat M and Shirkouhi SN (2009) 
Evaluating effective factors of implementing 
knowledge management based on FAHP method. 
Modelling & Simulation, 2009. AMS’09. Third Asia 
Intl. Conf. pp: 398–403.
31. Saaty TL (1980)  The analytic hierarchy process. 
1980. McGraw-Hill, NY.  
32. Soldatos J and Hardy J (2007) The new product 
development process in Australian grocery 
organizations. Mgt. 14(1), 61-67.
33. Thietart R and Xuereb J (1997) Rationality and the 
management of uncertainty in new product 
development. Actes de la conf. de MONTREAL.  
34. Wang W (2009) Evaluating new product development 
performance by fuzzy linguistic computing.  Expert 
Sys. Applications. 36(6), 9759-9766. 
35. Wei C and Chang H (2011) A new approach for 
selecting portfolio of new product development 
projects. Expert Sys. Applications. 38(1), 429-434.
Keywords Product innovation, Company, Multi criteria decision making, AHP, Fuzzy logic
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Share
Search in articles
Statistics
Journal Published articles
IJST 64
Journal Hits
IJST 191803
Journal Downloads
IJST 1320
Total users online -