PRADEC Interdisciplinary Conference Proceedings

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 1
Issue 1
Title National innovation systems: Institutional changes
Author Karel Muller
Abstract The aim of the paper is to discuss changing institutional framework of infrastructure for the support of innovation and contribute the assessment of its impact on innovation performance. Theoretical framework refers to systemic analysis of innovation based fields in the macro-format of national states as well as in meso- and micro-levels of their institutional setting. The article demonstrates application of method of institutional analysis which makes use of sociological and historical studies of modern institutions together with the use of the internationally comparable statistical databases on innovation resources as well as their efficiency. Both the theoretical and the empirical analysis of infrastructure for support of innovation in EU countries has been used to propose the typology of innovation performance, and its evolutionary dimension. The proposed typology has been applied to assess institutional changes of infrastructure for support of innovation in the Czech Republic.
Citation
References Adamski, W., Machonin, P., Zapf, W., 2002. Structural change and modernization in Post-Socialist Societies, Hamburg: Reinhold Krämer Verlag

Arundel, A., Hollanders, H., 2005. Innovation strengths and weaknesses, European Trend chart on Innovation EC, DG Enterprise, MERIT, Brussels

Ben-David, J., 1971. Scientist´s role in society, New York: Basic Books
Gorzelak, G., Ehrlich, E., Faltan, L., Illner, M., 2001. Central Europe in transition: Towards EU membership, Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House

Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., Soete, L., 1990. The economics of technical change and international trade, New York: Harvester Wheatshaf

Hollingsworth, R., 1998. Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovation, Mimeo, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin

Hollingsworth, R., 2000. “Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations,” Review of International Political Economy, Vol.7(4), pp.595-644

Hollingsworth, R., Boyer, R., 1997. Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Loudín, J., Schuch, K., 2009. Innovation Cultures, Challenges and Learning Strategy, Prague: Filosofia

Lundvall, B., 2005. “National innovation system, Cambridge (UK)s – analytical concept and development tool,” paper presented at 10th Anniversary Summer Conference 2005 on Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems, Copenhagen Business Schoul, Copenhagen

Müller, K., 1999. Cultural and social relations of technocracy in modern societies, In: Technocracy in Czech Lands (1900-1950), Archive of Academy of Sciences of the CR, Prague, pp.197-226 (in Czech)

Müller, K., 2002. “Innovation policy in the CR: From laissez faire to state activism,” Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol.5(4), pp.407-28

Müller, K., 2009. “Institutional changes of national innovation system: An indicator of innovation culture,” In: Loudín J., Schuch K. (eds.) Innovation

Cultures, Challenges and Learning Strategy, Prague: Filosofia, pp.47-68
Nelson, R., 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative study, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Keywords Innovation, national innovation system, infrastructure for support of innovation, institution, institutional cluster of modernity, institutional change
Pages 48-59
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Share
Search in articles
Statistics
Journal Published articles
PICP 163
Journal Hits
PICP 333841
Journal Downloads
PICP 826
Total users online -