Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business

  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
  Abstract | References | Citation | Download | Preview | Statistics
Volume 4
Issue 1
Online publication date 2010-02-10
Title The dynamics of link formation in patent innovator networks
Author Tamas Sebestyen, Andrea Parag, Beatrix Lanyi
Abstract The paper presents a simple extension of the Barabasi-Albert model of network evolution. This model is based upon the assumption that new links are formed not only according to the centrality of other nodes in a network but geodetic distance is also important in link formation. Simulation results show that if link formation is based on distance then the resulting network is more clustered than in the case of centrality being the dominant factor in link formation. Our empirical results show that in European regional patent inventor networks distance is a considerably more important factor in link formation than network centrality.
Balconi, M., Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., 2004. “Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data”, Research Policy 33, pp. 127-145

Barabási, A., 2003. Linked: How everything is connected to everything else what it means for business, Science and Everyday Life, Penguing Group, USA

Barabási, A., Albert, R., 1999. “Emergence of scaling in random networks”, Science 286, pp.509-12

Barabási, A., Albert, R., Jeong, H., 2000. “Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the world wide web”, Physica A 281, pp.69-77

Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P., 2002. “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”, DRUID Working Papers 02-12, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies

Ejermo, O., Karlsson, C., 2006. “Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships”, Research Policy, Elsevier, Vol.35(3), pp.412-30

Karlsson, C., 2008. Handbook of research on cluster theory, Edward Elgar, Chelthenham, UK

Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., 2007. “Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects”, Journal of Urban Economics 63, pp.871-84

Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., 1994. “The learning economy, industry & innovation, 1469-8390, Vol.1, Issue1, pp.23-42

Nonaka, I., 1994. “A Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, pp.14-37

Ozman, M., 2006.  “Networks and innovation : A survey of empirical literature”, Working Papers of BETA 2006-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, ULP, Strasbourg

Ter Wal, A., 2008. Cluster emergence and network evolution: a longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 0810

Varga, A., Parag, A., 2009. “Academic knowledge transfers and the structure of international research networks”, in: Attila Varga (ed.), University knowledge transfers and regional development: Geography, entrepreneurship and policy, Edward Elgar Publishers, pp.138-59

Wu, J., Tan Y.-J., Deng, H.-Z. and Zhu, D.-Z., 2007. Normalized entropy of rank distribution: A novel measure of heterogeneity of complex networks, Chinese Physics, 16, pp.1576-580

Keywords Innovation, network evolution, knowledge-transfer, cluster.
Pages 21-25
Download Full PDF Download
  Previous Article | Back to Volume | Next Article
Search in articles
Journal Published articles
PIEB 611
Journal Hits
PIEB 1765415
Journal Downloads
PIEB 28486
Total users online -